Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 48,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm by Richard L. Duquette
  You can peruse the respondants brief below, wherein they agreed with Wooley on appeal - which should result in a reversal of the conviction.IN THESUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIACOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, APPELLATE DIVISIONTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Plaintiff/Respondent,v.ANDREW WOOLLEY, Defendant/Appellant. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:19 pm
 But grabs two out-of-state cases to say that it should count as battery. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People stated that the unchallenged abstract showed that the defendant was aware that his license was suspended three days prior. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:44 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
This is incorrect.First, there is language in Chiafalo v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Given the demographic distribution of income and wealth in the United States, that means tax cases are mostly about rich White people. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am by Frank Pasquale
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The post Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State appeared first on [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm
  The Court of Appeal says:  "[I]n this case, the People have made no attempt to show that section 2076 directly and materially advances the state’s substantial interests. . . . [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
As readers of this blog probably know by now, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 3:33 pm by Mary Whisner
Washington State's case challenging President Trump's executive order banning travel by people from seven predominantly Muslim countries is moving fast. [read post]