Search for: "Rita v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Interestingly, given the amount of attention arbitration has gotten in recent years in state supreme courts around the country implementing the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron United State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Hence, Peel argues that his roommate's consent to the search was invalid and that his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution was violated. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal in the United States, UDV USA, https://‌ [https://‌‌8GS5-PW2W] (last visited Feb. 14, 2023). [6]. 573 U.S. 682 (2014). [7]. 574 U.S. 352 (2015). [8]. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
The Illinois / Chicago resource guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and special needs was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Regulation by Internet Intermediaries Moderator: Jack BalkinEmma Llanso & Rita Cant     “Internet Referral Units”: Co-Option of Private Content Moderation Systems for Extralegal Government CensorshipKate Klonick, discussant: Most UGC platforms have content standards to which users agree. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 1:13 am
The procedure in criminal cases is significantly similar all through the United States. ... [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Such an extension, however, would accord such upward departures even greater protection than they had under the mandatory Guidelines.In United States v. [read post]