Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman" Results 221 - 240 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2017, 10:31 am by Tom Smith
The real meaning of the Emoluments Clause, this theory concludes, stayed largely shrouded in the mists until the 21st century, when Seth Barrett Tillman, a law professor in Ireland, revealed it to the world. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"  Also, Seth Barrett Tillman notes that the Congressional Research Service has revised its guidance on the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 5:58 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Check out Seth Barrett Tillman's (Maynooth U., Ireland) contribution to the debate over Trump and foreign gifts in the NYT. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
ICYMI: Former LHB guest blogger Greg Ablavsky quoted in an NPR story on the acquittal of Ammon Bundy and his associates; Seth Barrett Tillman on President James Buchanan, Chief Justice Roger Taney, Copperheads—and the Quakers; John D. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Rosen’s article, Funding “Non-Traditional” Military Operations: The Alluring Myth of A Presidential Power of the Purse, was cited in the following article: Seth Barrett Tillman, Ex Parte Merryman: Myth, History, and Scholarship, 224 Mil. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  "Roger Brooks Taney Was as Bad as You Think"; Michael Ramsey on Seth Barrett Tillman on the Presentment Clause.If you're missing out on this year's meeting of the American Society for Legal History, you can follow the conversation on Twitter. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  Seth Barrett Tillman on The Journals Clause. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 ICYMI: Comedy and the Constitution: The Legacy of Lenny Bruce (h/t: H-Law); Able Archer 83 ("The secret history of the NATO exercise that almost triggered nuclear war"); and Seth Barrett Tillman on The Legislative Veto, INS v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
 Zephyr Teachout & Seth Barrett Tillman, The Foreign Emoluments Clause: Article I, Section 9, Clause 8, in The Interactive Constitution (National Constitution Center 2016). [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Seth Barrett Tillman, New Reform Club] Tags: Ireland, nastygrams, trademarks, videogames Teens develop videogames, receive nastygram over their name is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Seth Barrett Tillman teases a project on the Presidential Succession Act of 1947.ICYMI: Amanda B. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by William Baude
Seth Barrett Tillman, Who Can Be President of the United States? [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
” Also, Seth Barrett Tillman on why, as a legal matter, MacArthur was right and Truman was wrong.Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Seth Barrett Tillman on the impeachment of Associate Justice Samuel Chase, and Roland Nikles, a San Francisco attorney, on Worcestor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Seth Barrett Tillman, on where to find Elliot’s Debates on-line. [read post]
27 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Seth Barrett Tillman, Sometimes “People” = “Legislature,” The Originalism Blog We suppose that the history of political conventions runs to many volumes, but just now we happen to find ourselves enjoying Charles Peters, Five Days in Philadelphia: 1940, Wendell Willkie and the Political Convention That Freed FDR to Win World War II (Public Affairs, 2005). [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Justice Antonin Scalia to Seth Barrett Tillman on the indeterminate meaning of “shall” at the Framing. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Seth Barrett Tillman, in the Baltimore Sun, on whether Ex parte Merryman speaks to whether Taney’s statue (right) should remain on public view Paul Finkelman on HuffPo on whether Ted Cruz is a “natural born citizen. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:14 am by JB
Over at the New Reform Club, Seth Barrett Tillman argues that law professors and media commentators are wasting their time speculating about Ted Cruz's eligibility, when there is an even more complicated set of issues that could provide endless grist for the scholarly mill: He asks what would happen if a major party candidate (say, Hillary Clinton) were indicted and/or convicted (a) before the party convention, (b) before the November election, (c) before the electors… [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:10 am by Tom Smith
The question is what the term meant to the Framers and ratifiers circa 1787. [read post]