Search for: "Shepherd v. May" Results 221 - 240 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
”  As such, any argument that the manufacture should have included such a warning was preempted by Pliva v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:32 am
Mr Enchev entered into a contract with Voltino in May 2017 (though the contents of the contract were not disclosed to the court) and was found to be the controlling mind of Big Horn UK Limited, also in charge of Big Horn UK’s social media accounts.After a rejection of Red Bull’s opposition to the Big Horn mark on 23 May 2018, Red Bull’s appeal was upheld and Voltino’s trade mark application was rejected in its entirety on 7 January 2019. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:30 am by Michael Scutt
 It has always been the case that an employee can prepare to compete, but the recent case of Shepherds Investments Ltd v Walters [2006] EWHC 836 suggests that might not be quite so straightforward now. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:58 am by David Lat
It’s not a pretty document; Jay Shepherd would frown upon the inconsistent font usage.But will it get the job done? [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:38 am
If the law enforcement officer is unsatisfied with the employer's choice, then he may either "1. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:47 pm by Mark Ashton
In October the couple hired a common lawyer to shepherd the adoption. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:20 am
Oh hail, let's get ready to be taken by the sky --Altamonte Springs Imaging v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
So while this post may be bad as ever, at least it’s authentic. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:46 pm by tekEditor
In May 2012, however, the Supreme Court overruled that decision, ordering the Federal Circuit to reconsider the case in light of Mayo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
In July, the Seventh Circuit issued a unanimous opinion in the case of Emmis Communications Corp. v. [read post]