Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Agrium Inc., et al., No. 10-1712 (7th Cir. 2012) (en banc), is a decision of all the active sitting Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm by Josh Wright
§ 2 (2006), by willfully maintaining its monopoly power in the market for the sale of drugs for the treatment of PDA in the United States, and that Lundbeck’s conduct violated state law. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by Marc Edelman
In determining whether the relevant geographic market for men's basketball labor is limited to the United States or extends to the entire world, a court would likely consider within what range the movement of workers is "practicable. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:14 pm
No one has been executed in the United States for a crime other than murder since 1964. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm by Bona Law PC
United, Inc., the Supreme Court has “consistently stated” that “’the immediate buyers from the alleged antitrust violators’ may maintain a suit against the antitrust violators. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The U.S. purchasers alleged that the Chinese sellers had agreed to fix the price and quantity of vitamin C exported to the United States from China, in violation of §1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
Nevins  The Massachusetts United States District Court granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion dismissing antitrust claims brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Act by a company that had invented a new technology for testing metallic materials. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:24 am by Deb Givens
Relevent Sports filed suit under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, alleging that FIFA and USSF entered into an unlawful vertical market allocation agreement to limit the output of official games in the United States. [read post]