Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 221 - 240 of 2,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2020, 7:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Like this one, though it may seem unfair to the employees who are bound by the ruling.The case is ABM Industry Groups, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Quanta v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:48 pm
The Court granted one transfer with opinion on June 30th, in Phillip Miles v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]