Search for: "State v. Roth" Results 221 - 240 of 509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
  The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 1:24 am by charley foster
As Roth also held, this question is a matter for the states to decide. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm by RatnerPrestia
Each statement must either: (i) agree to the change of inventorship; or (ii) state that the person has no disagreement regarding the requested change. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
We saw a similar issue addressed in the context of SEC filings in the case of   Roth v Aon. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by Randall Hodgkinson
As some of you may remember, last fall, the KSC decided State v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:25 am by Michael D. Maloney
The doors to the district courts were effectively slammed shut by the Fifth Circuit’s decision in December 2011 in Rothe Development, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:16 pm
Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Crocker, 778 So.2d at 984 (citing Bishop v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:32 am by Hollis Kelly
Tugushev v (1) Orlov, (2) Roth, (3) Petric [2019] EWHC 645 (Comm) is a case which forms part of a bitter and high-profile battle between two Russian businessmen, the Claimant, Alexander Tugushev, and the First Defendant, Vitaly Orlov, alongside two of Mr Orlov’s associates, in relation to the Norebo Group, which is a corporate group which operates an international fishing business largely under Russian state fishing quotas. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports on Hernandez v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant’s assertion that he was reviewing the invoices is too general to defeat the claim (see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500, 501 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 702 [2 [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
 Ohio Elections Commn., 514 U.S. 334, 346 (1995), quoting from Roth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITBusiness Law Dismissal of Derivative Claim Against Company's Head for Short-Swing Stock Profits Is Vacated Roth v. [read post]