Search for: "State v. Advertiser Co., Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 1,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm by Neil Rosenbaum
On January 17, 2012, the Second Circuit granted Clorox’s motion for expedited appeal in the cat litter case (Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. [read post]
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2015) (concluding claims related to tailoring advertisements according to the time of day were directed to an abstract idea because that practice had been“long-practiced in our society”); buySAFE, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]