Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2008, 12:22 pm
Manchester City Council v Moran & Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378 This is a very important Court of Appeal judgment, which will have significant impact on Women’s Refuges and women fleeing domestic violence. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm
Updated | Bailey & Others v London Borough of Brent Council [2011] EWHC 2572 (Admin) – Read judgment Every Wednesday my daughter looks forward to the arrival of the mobile library at her nursery. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWCA Civ 1088 is a Court of Appeal hearing, referring questions about right of residence under Art 12 of Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 to the European Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 10:55 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Juncal, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 869 (25 July 2008) Goldeagle Properties Ltd v Thornbury Court Ltd (Rev 1) [2008] EWCA Civ 864 (25 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Brittain v Courtway Estates Holdings SA & Anor [2008] EWHC 1791 (Ch) (25 July 2008) Whiteley Insurance Consultants (a/k As Kingfisher Travel Insurance Services), Re v… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:00 am
TortTalkers may recall a previous Tort Talk post on the case of Cost v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Army Corps v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 8:23 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hills, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1871 (17 July 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Hiscox, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2008] EWHC 1986 (Admin) (25 July 2008) Kinsley, R (on the application of) v Hendon Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 2013 (Admin) (23 July 2008) S, R (on the application of) v Halton Borough Council & Anor [2008] EWHC 1982 (Admin)… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 6:55 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hills, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1871 (17 July 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Hiscox, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2008] EWHC 1986 (Admin) (25 July 2008) Kinsley, R (on the application of) v Hendon Magistrates' Court [2008] EWHC 2013 (Admin) (23 July 2008) S, R (on the application of) v Halton Borough Council & Anor [2008] EWHC 1982 (Admin) (21… [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
On January 7, 2019, the New Jersey Appellate Division published a decision in Borough of Glassboro v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
In Lax v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
SO, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham [2010] EWCA Civ 1101 I'm a bit slow in getting to this one (and the rest of our backlog). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
SO, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham [2010] EWCA Civ 1101 I'm a bit slow in getting to this one (and the rest of our backlog). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:20 pm
In London Borough of Islington v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
This type of provision, however, has survived in a number of collective bargaining agreement [see New York State Off. of Mental Health v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 53 A.D.3d 887].* Pursuant to OATH Rule of Practice section 1-49(d), respondent had requested that "Anonymous" be used in reporting this decision. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
Hussain v London Borough of Hounslow [2010] EW Misc 15 (CC) (01 December 2010) Not sure why this one wasn’t written up in November. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:38 pm
Ciaglia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
” Borough of W. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
Both are Article 14 discrimination based, with disabilities meaning a bedroom could not be shared, one adult partners and the other a non-dependant requiring overnight care 2 mights a week.There is also an Upper Tribunal decision, LA v Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (HB) [2013] UKUT 546 (AAC). [read post]
