Search for: "State v. Lowe"
Results 221 - 240
of 9,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am
On October 10, 2013, Kathryn Rivera filed a motion to dismiss the plenary action for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
I agree that the Abu Ghayth case is an easy one both normatively and pursuant to the very low bar set for speech-as-material-support by the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:17 am
Case citation: Patel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:09 am
A method for producing nanowires, comprising: exposing at least one nanowire precursor to metal nanoparticles in a nanowire growth solution comprising an organic solvent in a non-supercritical state, whereby the metal nanoparticles act as seed particles for the growth of the nanowires, wherein the nanowires comprise a material selected from the group consisting of (a) Group IV elements, (b) Group II elements other than cadmium, (c) Group VI elements other than tellurium, (d) combinations of… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:30 am
Probola v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:47 am
Administrative law — Due process — Notice and opportunity to be heard This appeal asks us to determine whether the Maryland Board of Public Works (the “Board”) erred when it granted a tidal wetlands license to the Maryland Port Administration (“MPA”), a Maryland State agency, for the proposed Phase III expansion of the Paul S. ... [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:23 pm
In today’s case (Bourdin v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
State). [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Myrisha Lewis As scholars and the public consider the extensive consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:16 pm
We have two posts today that examine McPadden v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:36 pm
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois has issued another opinion in the Noonan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:25 am
In Miami Herald v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:43 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
So for that issue, absent anything new (like the Supreme Court stepping in and saying that its earlier dicta about the scope of state law in Viking River Cruises was correct), we pretty much know at this point how these things will go in both federal and state court.Judge Lee adds a concurrence that has little to do with the substance of the court's holding but that he nonetheless feels is important to add just so employers don't potentially get stuck with issue… [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
From the Fairly Used Blog For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
In doing so, the court reversed the state's lowe court of appeals decision in State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
In its landmark 1963 decision Gideon v. [read post]
