Search for: "State v. Zimmerman" Results 221 - 240 of 387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
(This could happen either if D was planning to kill V all along, if D and V are involved a dispute and D kills V in a moment of anger, or if D and V are involved in a fight that doesn’t suffice to authorize deadly force, but D uses deadly force in any case.) [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm by Venkat
Paterson Court Orders Plaintiff to Turn Over Facebook and MySpace Passwords in Discovery Dispute -- Zimmerman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm by Eric Goldman
State Farm Mutual * Court Orders Plaintiff to Turn Over Facebook and MySpace Passwords in Discovery Dispute — Zimmerman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. 4th District.Criminal law -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness claim may not be raised on direct appeal where ineffectiveness is not apparent on face of recordJAMES MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:11 am by Joe Palazzolo
Associated Press Arizona State Sen. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am by John Elwood
Next up is Zimmerman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
The court noted that the Massachusetts courts had held that these duties apply to minority shareholders just as they do to controlling shareholders. 128 F.3d at 6, citing Zimmerman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 am by Brian Shiffrin
Brown, 21 A.D.2d 738, 249 N.Y.S.2d 922; State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 5:48 am
On Tuesday, ACCA will hear oral arugment in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:10 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The legislative history of Section 230 refers specifically to a New York state case — Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:00 pm by Zachary Spilman
Zimmerman, 6 C.M.R. 12, 20 (C.M.A., 1952); see also United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]