Search for: "Stock v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 5,449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am by Giles Peaker
Reciprocals are only agreed when there is no material loss to the Council in terms of available housing stock. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In the United States, we’ve long had transactions in mutual funds generally settle in one day. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 1:02 pm by lennyesq
When that happens, there will be a direct line from their opinion in Garland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration         Number           Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:39 am by Amy Howe
The justices have not yet issued their decision in that case, United States v. [read post]