Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
And just one case, Sears v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivity and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivty and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Strickland, 531 F.3d 406, 408 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
It was held in Strickland v Washington and People v Linares that a defendant in a criminal proceeding is constitutionally entitled to effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
In Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
As in Missouri v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
The majority held that the error was prejudicial, and the state court’s contrary conclusion was an objectively unreasonable application of the governing case, Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In last week’s post, we explored how the case of Adnan Syed serves as a powerful vehicle to teach Strickland v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
Wrinkles instead claimed that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
The court will determine whether Appellant's counsel rendered deficient performance and, if so, whether such deficiency prejudiced Appellant under Strickland v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Strickland v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:05 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 12:48 pm
Strickland, decided by this Court on March 2, 2007, and has joined in the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing En Banc, currently pending before this Court, see Cooey v. [read post]
