Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 221 - 240 of 766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am by CMS
Lord Hodge (on behalf of Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) delivered the majority view, with only Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:31 pm by Quinn Norton
Anons the world over are celebrating by drinking, watching V for Vendetta, crying over how cute kitten pictures are, and posting pages and pages of famous peoples’ personal data all over the web. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
” Part 1 and Part 2 – Paul Bernal Is following people illegal? [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Hughes, which involves the standards for granting qualified immunity to police officers in Section 1983 civil-rights suits, noting that “[i]n recent years, the justices have regularly shielded police from being sued, even when officers wrongly shoot innocent people in their own homes. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
 He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Růžový… [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 7:21 am by Cody M. Poplin
Seamus Hughes wrote this week’s Foreign Policy Essay on the use of material support to prosecute radicalized young people in the United States, asking if there isn’t a better way to stem the tide of foreign fighters flowing into Iraq and Syria. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 5:39 am by Walter Olson
For example, when the Court decided the 1934 case of Blaisdell v. [read post]