Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes"
Results 221 - 240
of 712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm
And, indeed, he has the next opinion, in Hughes v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Růžový… [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Board of Education, 1954, and related cases; andCases concerning elections and voting rights in the 1940s and 1950s with one Alabama primary election case, Gray v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 7:21 am
Seamus Hughes wrote this week’s Foreign Policy Essay on the use of material support to prosecute radicalized young people in the United States, asking if there isn’t a better way to stem the tide of foreign fighters flowing into Iraq and Syria. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
EFF cited a 6th Circuit case, US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
Connell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
Unfortunately, Parts IV, V, VI, which deal with substantive IP rights and practice, loses the personal touch and insight that the early and final chapters possess. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 5:39 am
For example, when the Court decided the 1934 case of Blaisdell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 11:42 am
Hashem v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Nicholas also set out the position in respect of injunctive relief following the Huawei v ZTE framework. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
There are two types of people in D.C.: those who can’t handle a little bit of snow; and those who enjoy ridiculing them. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
Part 2 – Hugh Tomlinson QC Privacy: the way ahead? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
Hughes: could compare cases where they narrow the claim of the TM registration v. narrow the claim of the patent—Maker’s Mark case where they have a registration for a wax seal but claim only red. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:31 am
The Daily Sketch, 11th December 1913, covering the appeal of Bebb v The Law Society. [read post]
