Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lucas"
Results 221 - 240
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In Ring v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
" Armstrong v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:50 pm
Sure they have bounty hunters, the Sand People, and Hutt mobsters but alas none from the learned profession. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Lord Lucas proposes new UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 section to provide remedy for groundless copyright threats (1709 Copyright Blog) (Techdirt) US CAFC scraps point of novelty for design patents: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Inventive Step) … [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
(People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 11:54 pm
., about power over—but about people having the power to persuade or dissuade, to bestow benefits on others. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:35 am
People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 11:42 pm
Lucas's Star Wars was an epic, mythological, space opera. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Essentially the thread involves O'Brien and Ken's wife making the final plans for a romantic getaway to Cabo San Lucas. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:14 am
Perry, and finding an Establishment Clause violation in the other, McCreary County v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
Any day now… Meanwhile, let’s take a look at some people who were hard at work. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
Procedural History The owners filed an inverse condemnation action, claiming that, under Lucas v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 22, 2008 US v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:35 am
In People v Lucas (2008 NY Slip Op 07948 [10/21/08]) the Court of Appeals rejected a broad reading of its holding in People v Cahill (2 NY3d 14 [2003], in which the Court had held that it was impermissible double counting to use the intent to kill to transform the criminal trespass into a burglary in the first degree and to then use the burglary in the first degree to elevate a murder in the second degree to a murder in the first degree. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
Lucas Foote v Piscotti, held that persons charged with violating the terms of post release supervision not imposed by judges are entitled to immediate release. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:17 pm
Lucas Foote v Piscotti the Fourth Department answered this question with a clear "yes. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:37 pm
Un gustazo.Para los que no fueron, fui anotando cosas que se oyeron, cosas que se me ocurrieron a màmientras los demás hablaban, cosas que anoté o noté en el BnB v. 1.0. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
