Search for: "Thomas v. Lee" Results 221 - 240 of 787
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the publication of Lee C. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
There were statements in open court in the cases of O’Brien, Thomas and Bayliff v NGN before Mann J. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
A decade ago, two esteemed scholars of judicial behavior, Lee Epstein and Andrew D. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
This history also attains greater relevance in light of Justice Thomas’s recent troubling call for the U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
In real life meanwhile big-ticket libel suits are used to silence conservatives [Competitive Enterprise Institute press release (leading media orgs including RCFP, SPJ, ASNE support rehearing of D.C. court ruling favorable toward Michael Mann defamation action), NR editors, Jack Fowler] “The media’s Covington coverage was appalling, but Nick Sandman’s libel lawsuit is not the answer” [Robby Soave, Irina Manta] Another part of the forest: Justice Clarence Thomas… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm by Adam Feldman
Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the court’s majority opinion and was joined by Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy, all Republican appointees. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
 Thomas Alured Faunce: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer: Evergreening and Market Power as a Blockbuster Drug Goes Off Patent (Source: SSRN) Atty. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
Prominent scholars, most notably Lee Epstein, William Landes and Richard Posner, have found empirical support for the proposition that the current court is more pro-business than previous iterations. [read post]