Search for: "United States v. Generes"
Results 221 - 240
of 34,555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2025, 2:59 pm
President Trump's team has produced a narrative to support this decision, as well as more generally the se of tariffs as one of a number of tools for reframing US trade policy under a new Americas First Policy. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 2:48 pm
In a significant decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 8:21 am
On March 22nd, a different kind of Presidential Memorandum, “Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and the Federal Court”, directed the Attorney General “to seek sanctions against attorneys and law firms who engage in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States or in matters before executive departments and agencies of the United States”, to refer for disciplinary action lawyers whose conduct in… [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 6:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 7:20 pm
” Defendants petitioned to appeal the District Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (“Circuit Court”), and on March 18, 2025, the Circuit Court granted Defendants’ petition. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 3:57 pm
And in 2017, Berkeley ranked fifth in a Jewish publication's list of the 40 worst colleges for Jewish students in the United States and Canada. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 11:02 am
Under federal law, Medicaid funds cannot generally be used for abortions. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 9:36 am
Today, C-sections are common interventions, accounting for approximately one-third of births in the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 8:28 am
Republicans, like the abolitionists before them, swore by Worcester v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
” The societies for the suppression of vice did not stamp out opposition or convince Americans to modify their intimate lives, but their idea of sexual purity did gain traction in the courts, culminating in the 1896 decision of United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
See Moody v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 7:45 pm
In Samson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:03 pm
” That case, Yesler Terrace Community Council v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 3:50 pm
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 3:10 pm
United States (HE), which the Supreme Court decided in 1935. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 12:49 pm
In Marsh v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 12:47 pm
On Friday, Acting Solicitor General Sarah M. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm
Part V considered the meaning of the phrase “Office . . . under the United States,” which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
