Search for: "United States v. Malcolm" Results 221 - 232 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (07-214), on whether the False Claims Act covers claims submitted to a federal contractor, as opposed to the federal government itself. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
[post by Malcolm Mooney](...)What is interesting to me is that while examiners may be able to rely on anything that may prove anticipation or obviousness, e.g., a wayback machine entry dated before the critical date, the same evidence is - at this point - unlikely to be admissible in court due to hearsay issues.AFAIK, the wayback machine has overcome hearsay objections in only one case (Telewizja Polska United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1164), asking whether the Tucker Act's six-year statute of limitations is jurisdictional (and may thus not be waived by the parties). [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 9:01 pm
Federal Bureau of Prisons (06-9130), asking whether the United States waived sovereign immunity with respect to suits for losses of prison inmates' personal property. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Walton, Judge, The United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaClosing remarks4:15-4:30 p.m. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
During a unit search on July 11, 2007, all of my writing paper wasconfiscated and all of Steve Champion's reference books were taken. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
United States of America (The Bahamas) [2007] UKPC 52 (23 July 2007) Source: [read post]