Search for: "United States v. Francisco" Results 221 - 240 of 1,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States and Microsoft v. i4i garnered the most coverage. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am by The Docket Navigator
The United States favored a stay of litigation in San Francisco Technologies v Adobe, et al., in the Northern District of California this spring to await the Federal Circuit’s decision in Stauffer.Now the Federal Circuit has line up squarely against Simonian in this matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
No "Friday for Fortnite" in San Francisco--at least not this week's Friday (October 21), the day for which the Epic Games v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 10:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Whether States with interests should be permitted to intervene to defend a rule when the United States ceases to defend. 2. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Contents include:ArticlesSienho Yee, Notes on the International Court of Justice (Part 8)—Interim Accord (FYROM v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:48 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco must still approve the settlement in the lawsuit, known as Ahmed v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Petitioning States quickly moved to intervene in the Ninth Circuit to protect their interests previously represented by the United States. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm by Andrea Cortland
Again, the case was reversed and remanded, this time by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
The editorial board of the Miami Herald applauds last week’s decision in Thompson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
Harrington A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco today ruled, in a 2 - 1 decision, that the long-standing prohibition on the carriage of paid political and issue advertising by noncommercial television and radio stations is unconstitutional and may no longer be enforced by the FCC. [read post]