Search for: "United States v. Patrone"
Results 221 - 240
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
If it can be proven that a bar not only allowed but also encouraged a patron to become drunk, and that patron drives off and causes a serious car accident, that bar can be held liable for the damages. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
” Parole in place allows noncitizens who enter the United States without authorization to remain for a specific period of time. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 13-7451, Slip op. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
See Eurowest Cinemas LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
In a similar vein, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
The main cause of action named in these lawsuits is one of negligence, wherein plaintiffs claim the landowner has breached its duty of care by failing to maintain an AED on-site; chief among these cases is Verdugo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
The main cause of action named in these lawsuits is one of negligence, wherein plaintiffs claim the landowner has breached its duty of care by failing to maintain an AED on-site; chief among these cases is Verdugo v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:12 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am
The good news is that, for the most part, the legal framework both in the United States and internationally recognizes these principles. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
I.R.S., the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that the authority granted by 31 U.S.C. section 330 did not extend to regulation of tax return preparers. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
In this case, the source is a set of books published by the United States government that contains the opinions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
Commuters Unite! [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
The restaurant knew that its patrons would cross the street, and derived a direct economic benefit from their use of the path. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:00 pm
[W]e [therefore] hold that these convictions violated petitioners’ rights to due process of law guaranteed them by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am
That’s the majority rule across the United States. [read post]
