Search for: "United States v. Powell"
Results 221 - 240
of 787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 8:57 am
SUSA’s software was hacked; and that SUSA had been banned from participating in prior elections in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:25 pm
Spain, 209 F.3d 713, 715-16 (8th Cir.2000) (adopting continuing seizure approach); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:45 am
" Powell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Today’s decision in Powell goes some way towards resolving that quandary. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 3:39 am
"); United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
From Khalil v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:59 am
Because “tribal sovereign immunity may not be asserted against the United States” in such a case, the Tribe’s immunity argument fails as a matter of law and the enforceability of the Summons at issue must be assessed in accordance with the framework articulated by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:31 am
The Supreme Court on June 19 unanimously vacated and remanded an Eleventh Circuit per curiam decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
She then looks to United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
The case that established that principle, Powell v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:39 am
United States Subscription RequiredU.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:47 pm
Du v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, 783 (1995) (first quoting Powell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
