Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 6,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit, with a pretty tough panel (Chief Judge Edmondson, and Judges Tjoflat and Hill) affirmed a below guidelines sentence in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 3:39 pm
King v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 3:41 am
Ali v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 3:53 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Since Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm
(NA) Today, federal District Court Judge Drew Tipton issued a ruling in Texas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
As to specific points in the EC Consultation, this is what UK Government thinks:Robust ...Cross-border portabilityThe UK is in favour of increasing cross-border availability of content services by means of market-led licensing arrangements [possibly similar, to a certain extent, to the Copyright Hub? [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:11 am
See, Burns v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Border Patrol agent liable for the shooting death of their son, who was on the Mexican side of the border. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not met,… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Borough of Cliffside Park v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:14 pm
The case is 134 Original, New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:56 am
In Montres Breguet SA v Samsung Electronics, the owners of Swatch (and various other watch brand trade marks), objected to Samsung providing third-party watch faces on their Galaxy App Store featuring Swatch’s marks (the “Marks”). [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:31 am
-Mexico border. [read post]
