Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 11,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 5:35 am
We must provide the people with a vision of the future. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:08 pm
California, United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:40 am
People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
August 16, 2011): The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated .... [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
That’s ground 2, Schedule 2, Housing Act 1985. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Wilson wrote, in explaining why crime continued to fall (even during the Great Recession, when standard liberal theory says it should rise)(emphasis added):One obvious answer is that many more people are in prison than in the past. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
There is no reason for selecting the five year limitation, which has no relationship to the connection people have to Canada (people living abroad may have close connections, people living in Canada may actually have little) and which is not indicative of the impact of Canadian laws on Canadians, whether living elsewhere or not. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
United States, Sarah Friedman on Hansberry v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
But the case is dismissed.The case is Bartels v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm
utm_term=.e26cdbdc081bOf interest to patent people, Taney was in the dissenting four in Winans v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:28 am
This set of petitions covers issues such as disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act, the types of standardized testing accommodations required for people with disabilities, and the Double Jeopardy Clause. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
”IMAGING DEVICE means any mechanical, digital or electronic viewing device, camera or any other instrument capable of recording, storing or transmitting visual images that can be utilized to observe a person (Penal Law § 250.40[2]).SURREPTITIOUSLY means that the act was done stealthily or secretively (People v Piznarski,113 AD3d 166 [3rd Dept 2013], citing Dictionary.com [Dictionary.com Unabridged, Random House, Inc.]). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:03 pm
By Eric Goldman Sumien v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 3:25 am
The house must be tidy. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 11:48 pm
Lowhorn v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:21 pm
In People v. [read post]
