Search for: "People v. Stephens" Results 2381 - 2400 of 2,666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
After much national and international uproar at these blatant violations of human rights, the Supreme Court finally ruled five to three in Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am by Benjamin Bissell
” According to the Dui Hua Foundation, approximately 2,400 people were executed in China last year, compared to 39 people in the US. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Driver: Harlan’s Plessy dissent claims so many admirers in the modern era largely because people cite an isolated fragment from the opinion. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
The justice said she was “encouraged by the number of people, especially young people, who are expressing themselves in opposition. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
Put simply, natural justice involves decision-makers informing people of the case against them or their interests, giving them a right to be heard (the hearing rule); not having a personal interest in the outcome (the rule against bias); and acting only on the basis of logically probative evidence (the no evidence rule). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]