Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 12,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 7:30 am
United States, and Radice v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
United States (1939) 308 U.S. 271, and United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 9:14 am
In addition, it appears that there were nearly 30 million telephones connected to the phone system in the United States by 1948. 4. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
In wake of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:42 am
Dinan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:46 am
See Varela v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
Copyright protection in the United States was “effectively unavailable for pornography” until the landmark decision by the Fifth Circuit in Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
This was evident in the fact that the birth rate in the United States fell dramatically from 1800 to 1900. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:31 am
On April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) preempted California state contract law which courts had applied to invalidate arbitration agreements that did not permit class arbitration. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
• What is left to find out on the California and federal levels? [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:31 pm
On May 12, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the patent eligibility of software in Enfish, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
Guests: Brian Schweitzer: State of Montana, @brianschweitzer Rick Hasen: University of California, Irvine, @rickhasen Dave Levinthal: Politico, @davelevinthal Eugene Volokh: University of California, Los Angeles, @VolokhC Links: Schweitzer on ‘mining for influence in Montana’ (NY Times) Buckley v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:33 pm
United States (Quiet Title Act) Mestek v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
The United States favored a stay of litigation in San Francisco Technologies v Adobe, et al., in the Northern District of California this spring to await the Federal Circuit’s decision in Stauffer.Now the Federal Circuit has line up squarely against Simonian in this matter. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 2:00 am
One of the LRDP’s stated goals is to “[i]mprove the existing housing stock and construct new student beds and faculty housing units. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 4:12 pm
No, a straw purchase, where an individual legally buys a firearm and then transfers it to someone prohibited from owning one, is illegal in California and across the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:43 am
(See, Harold Griffith v. [read post]
