Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 10,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
§ 1703(c)(d). [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
§ 1703(c)(d). [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:10 am
" Armour & Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 11:06 am
Egyszerűbb, Mint Gondolnád! [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 11:06 am
Egyszerűbb, Mint Gondolnád! [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
Roy oftwo counts of kidnapping, see [New Hampshire Revised Statutes] § 633:1, I(c), II; [one count of first degree assault, see [New Hampshire Revised Statutes] § 631:1, I(d), four counts of second degree assault, see [New Hampshire Revised Statutes] § 631:2, I(c)-(d), one count of criminal restraint, see [New Hampshire Revised Statutes] § 633:2 (2007), and two counts of simple assault, see [New Hampshire Revised… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
§ 1446 (c)(2)(B)). [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
The new Common Practice explains that:“A change only in colour does not alter the distinctive character of the trade mark, as long as the following requirements are met: a) the word/figurative elements coincide and are the main distinctive elements; b) the contrast of shades is respected; c) colour or combination of colours does not possess distinctive character in itself and; d) colour is not one of the main contributors to the overall distinctiveness of the mark. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
SeeRestatement (Second) of Torts §134 & comment b (1970).Restatement of TortsThe heeding presumption is derived from language in Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment j (1965) that dealt with the opposite situation − presuming that an adequate warning, when given, will be read and heeded. [read post]
16 May 2008, 5:09 am
Zinn won in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
L'épreuve B ne durera plus que 3 heures, et des jeux de revendications seraient proposés par le client. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 8:44 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 6:21 pm
In other words, Lone Star argued that by relying on any aspect of a documentary support for knowledge in the art meant that such documents were part of the actual ground (i.e., A+B+C+D+E) akin to the new ground in Philips. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
See the 2011 C&D letter, the 2006 C&D letter and the 2006 C&D response. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
B) Transparency and participation1) Public comments v. public consultations2) Optional v. mandatory methods III) Transparency and adjudication / Transparence et jugement A) Transparency and trial 1) Exception: in camera trial in common law v. in camera trial in civil law2) Extension of scope of transparency requirement: Transparency of alternative dispute resolution (arbitration, mediation and negotiation) B) Transparency and court ruling1) The… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
This is not the first time that a copyright owner has sued for infringement under a statutory regime authorizing the copying and dissemination of a work (see Geophysical Service v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Useful illustration b/c Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
By Livia Solaro While cultural heritage disputes have often proved heralds of international tensions, very few cases have caused quite the stir as the one revolving around Victorious Youth, a rare example of a life-size bronze statue from the classical Greek period. [read post]
