Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 7,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
” He submitted a declaration, but the court dings him because the declaration did not state under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that its contents were true. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:47 am
Medina v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:25 am
Abbott Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State of California (March 26, 2014, C070836) ___ Cal.App.4th ___.The 14th District Agricultural Association operates the Santa Cruz County fairgrounds outside of Watsonville. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:15 pm
It does appear there is no good solution to this knotty problem.Our laws become meaningless unless enforced. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:39 pm
First, the three-judge panel moved too quickly to the mass-prisoner-release remedy, and should have considered more complete and up-to-date information regarding the state of the California system and alternative remedies. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:33 am
First, the three-judge panel moved too quickly to the mass-prisoner-release remedy, and should have considered more complete and up-to-date information regarding the state of the California system and alternative remedies. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm
See Barnhill v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:01 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:06 pm
(That would be the 1948 California Supreme Court case that wiped out the state's ban on marriages between certain races.) [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
California apparently is a hotbed of private, would-be regulation of the food supply, and a similar attempt to restrict the sale of certain fish was declared preempted in the state court system and is on appeal in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:57 am
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) On December 31, 2011, as a final act for the year, the First Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal issued a good appellate decision for employers on the issue of independent contractor status, Arnold v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:35 am
But in general things don't look good for private plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 11:17 am
In Polo v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am
"So yesterday AAG Delrahim's folks made a filing with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in FTC v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:49 am
The plaintiff hired Allied to move some of his household goods from southern California to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 3:02 pm
Chantiles v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:29 am
" That is a non sequitur, though.I'll grant that CA might not be able to prove under Section 209(b)(1)(B) that it is uniquely vulnerable to climate change among the states (although they make a pretty good case). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
(Stevenson Real Estate Services, Inc. v. [read post]
