Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
In People ex rel. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Let’s talk about today’s decision in King v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
Although there has been a great deal of conversation about this decision in relation to the Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
Specifically, in the 2004 case of Metropolitan Intercollegiate Basketball Ass'n v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:12 am
Ashcroft (later v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:45 am
The purpose of this forced purchase, coupled with the arbitrary price ratios and controls, is to require many people to buy artificially high-priced policies to subsidize the coverage for others. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
” In 1994, in Dolan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
Hotfile pays uploaders who post popular large files, which could naturally encourage people to upload infringing files. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 10:10 am
ShareMiranda v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
In Hennig v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
" RCA v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am
Puffery is an overlay onto the fact/opinion divide: it allows courts to reject liability for what might look like factual, verifiable claims (such as the cheapest prices in the universe, or even the cheapest prices in West Virginia ) because they are too exaggerated or vague to be believed by reasonable consumers. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
"[8] In Europe, the term, "gray market" applies to goods sold outside the European Economic Area (hereinafter "EEA") and then re-imported against the wishes of their copyright holder.[9] The gray market has the potential to harm more than just the reputation of the goods being sold, although reputational harm has served as the basis for most innovators' arguments.[10] When a manufacturer sells goods to distributors abroad, it often does so at… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The third case, EEOC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:02 pm
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris – Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
