Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
” Cariou v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
" RCA v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
"[8] In Europe, the term, "gray market" applies to goods sold outside the European Economic Area (hereinafter "EEA") and then re-imported against the wishes of their copyright holder.[9] The gray market has the potential to harm more than just the reputation of the goods being sold, although reputational harm has served as the basis for most innovators' arguments.[10] When a manufacturer sells goods to distributors abroad, it often does so at… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The third case, EEOC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Experiment asked about fairness between songwriters with prior relationship v. met through an ad. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:02 pm
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am
Wheat, State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:17 am
Price Waterhouse, 84 N.Y.2d 535, 541, 644 N.E.2d 1009, 620 N.Y.S.2d 318 (1994))); Shumsky v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Int’l., Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:54 am
The first, Stern v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris - Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris – Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Exorbitant price increases by Turing and Valeant were described as outliers. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
The NC AGO recently also filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
The five-to-three decision in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
The board believed in good faith that the offer price was inadequate by no small margin. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:42 pm
Same goes for prices. [read post]
