Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 3:59 am
SHAPIRO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm
United States, 530 U. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 7:54 am
H/T to Mark Kantor. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
In July 2022, the American Bar Association weighed in on the internecine legal warfare between political activist attorneys and state bar associations this way: “In June 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Janus v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
This highly readable book will delight and fascinate anyone interested in labor history, constitutional development, or the regulation of women’s work in the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
” Furthermore the European Court has recognised in B v United Kingdom; P v United Kingdom ([2001] 2 FLR 261) that the Article 6 requirement to hold a public hearing was subject to exceptions. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:53 am
Lightning-v-Harmon-Complaint [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
Cavern City Tours Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
United States, in which the justices will consider whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:16 am
Peter Turdin, Jr. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:44 pm
Chakrabarty On June 16, 1980, 30 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark patentable subject matter decision in the case of Diamond v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Napue v People of State of Illinois, 360 US 264; Pyle v State of Kansas, 317 US 213; cf. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 6/9/09Cite: The Clorox Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:37 am
The case is titled Metrokane, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
