Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2018, 9:13 pm
One example is Swimways Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:44 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Barker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
CVSG United States ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm
’s SW now viewed as “crushing failure” [Gideon Kanner] Time for a radical step: strip local government of its project-blocking powers [Edward Glaeser, Cato] When reporting on European anti-fracking movements, try not to think of a Bear [Jonathan Adler] “The EPA wants to redefine ‘the waters of the United States’ to mean virtually any wet spot in the country. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:41 am
The NAHB filed suit claiming that, by issuing NWP 46, the Corps had unlawfully asserted jurisdiction over upland ditches, which it contends are categorically excluded from being “waters of the United States” and thus are categorically not subject to CWA regulation. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Even further, new complexes often have floor drains for mechanical failures or backups so water does not flood into adjacent units. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
This expansive language would likely chill a wide range of political activity in the United States directed at the Israeli government — activity that is constitutionally protected, regardless whether members of Congress agree with it. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
” Jennifer Harris asked if it’s time for new rules regarding Chinese investment in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
” In an op-ed for the Denver Post, Tom Bie addresses the potential implications of PPL Montana for “anyone who likes fishing, rafting or canoeing public water in the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm
Immigration Law Case: United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:30 am
United States, Nos. 08-CO-973, 08-CO-1263 & 10-CO-971 (D.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:53 am
THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, No. 10-0491 the 8-1 decision in U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
