Search for: "In re Levi"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 2,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
Last week, the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, handed down one of the more intriguing decisions by a New York court I’ve seen in a long time involving a dispute between LLC members. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
In re Termination of Emp. of Pratt, 40 Ohio St.2d 107 (1974) (“A fiduciary relationship exists when special confidence and trust is reposed in the integrity and fidelity of another and there is a resulting position of superiority or influence, acquired by virtue of this special trust. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 10:23 am
The book thus presents itself as a quest for the (re)discovery of such an alternative normativity. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
” In re Marriage of Sherwin, 123 Ill. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:17 am
There is no way around that, unless asset prices were to re-inflate in a year, which is not even remotely possible. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The third quarter of 2023 was eventful for both domestic and international cartel enforcers. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
This might be because we're considering a nudity tax instead of an erotic-expression tax; or maybe, even as to an erotic-expression tax, you're not convinced by my strict-scrutiny argument presented above. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:01 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:52 pm
I. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
I said at the time in a blog that was very critical of the Governments use of omnibus legislation in this way that:· Will the imposition of explicit criteria re “competitive market” and “public interest” cause more mischief, costs and need for protracted and expensive evidence from so-called experts? [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am
For example, re the first two questions, we were told that the website was redone to make if more accessible to the “general user”. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
Where a trademark is located matters. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Thus, in Matter of Levi v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Senate’s Russia investigation, and tens of thousands of dollars in fines levied by the FEC. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
This scholarly fixation on Muslim masculinity first, isolates Muslim men as the presumptive targets of Islamophobia; second, overlooks the distinct ideas that drive “feminine Islamophobia” and the specific injuries it levies upon Muslim women; and third, perpetuates the erasure of female experiences with systems of Islamophobia from scholarly view. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:50 am
Now, roughly a century later, they’re tilting right. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
We’re looking at similar, significant challenges and opportunities today, minus the piles of droppings. [read post]
