Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:09 am
Oldham wrote in September 2022 that social media companies do not have a right to “muzzle” free speech and act more like common carriers that are “central public forums for public debate and have enjoyed governmental support in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:00 am
” United States. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:45 am
Justice Thomas had dissented in January when the Court, in another election case (Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Indeed, the Supreme Court of Canada recently delivered its decision in Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401 that found the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act to be constitutionally invalid. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
McQuigg is now the fifth to reach the Court on the controversy after a wave of lower court rulings — striking down state bans in almost all of the cases so far — that had followed the Supreme Court’s decision fourteen months ago in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Future historians may credit the nomination and, if confirmed, the first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court, to President Joe Biden for fulfilling a campaign promise. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no immediate impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am
” Resistance from Taiwan, Japan and the United States, however, shows little sign of breaking. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 11:38 am
Instead, "only decisions of the United States Supreme Court, [the Eleventh Circuit], or the highest court in a state can 'clearly establish' the law. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:14 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:13 am
In Summum v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
House of Representativesin response to the United States International Trade Commission's mid-December notice relating to the ITC's investigation of Qualcomm's first complaint against Apple (with Qualcomm seeking an import ban, which is the ITC's sole remedy).The United States Senators and United States Representatives who filed those letters, which support Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
Together, Whole Foods and Wild Oats operated 300 of the approximately 34,000 supermarkets in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
It is to be assumed that socialist core values are not static but, they evolve accordingly to the concrete needs of economic development. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:03 am
Thus it presumably authorizes the same scope of activities, which the Supreme Court found to include law of war detention in Hamdi v. [read post]
