Search for: "Majors v. Smith" Results 2441 - 2460 of 2,979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
In the news Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry granted clemency to Richard Tandy Smith. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Obama, EFF Explains Why Metadata Matters and the Third-Party Doctrine Doesn’t (EFF) NSA Spying (EFF’s landing page re NSA spying and their use of metadata) EFF cases in relation to NSA spying and metadata in order of file date: Hepting v AT&T Jewel v NSA First Unitarian v NSA Smith v Obama Win! [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:05 pm
            This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
In reaching this conclusion, the McMurray majority noted important underpinnings and a caveat to their decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
 The large majority of the defamatory imputations were rejected. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
It argues that it provides a glimpse into the part the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) may have to play in major commercial disputes. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
Meanwhile, other intellectual property litigation has generally held steady or, as is the case in the patent arena, slowed down as challenges to patents have increased at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in the wake of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act that took effect in 2012 and new restrictions on patentability set forth in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Summary affirmance seems unlikely; summary reversal would be a heavy lift when dealing with a 119-page majority opinion. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
So what do we know about major tech companies, like Google, Facebook, Yahoo, and Microsoft? [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 Essentially, Judge Vinson dissented on every major point in the majority opinion, but concurred in the result. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
  In an attempt to escape the obvious conclusion that the common stock is a covered security, the plaintiffs argued that the stock must actually be traded to qualify, and cited Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
Unless a legislature decides to title a law the “Retroactive Punishment of Child Molesters Statute,” the Supreme Court of the United State has held in Smith v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Jennifer Davis
Kilmer, Erika Jean Pribanic-Smith, Debra Reddin van Tuyll, Janice R. [read post]