Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2017, 7:51 am
Perhaps one of the most important eminent domain cases in recent years was Kelo v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
”IMAGING DEVICE means any mechanical, digital or electronic viewing device, camera or any other instrument capable of recording, storing or transmitting visual images that can be utilized to observe a person (Penal Law § 250.40[2]).SURREPTITIOUSLY means that the act was done stealthily or secretively (People v Piznarski,113 AD3d 166 [3rd Dept 2013], citing Dictionary.com [Dictionary.com Unabridged, Random House, Inc.]). [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:31 am
" The search of the house thereafter was unreasonable. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:18 pm
Constitutional litigation has a lot in common with a trip to a fun house hall of mirrors. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:44 pm
The newest salvo comes from Ohio, the land that gave us US v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:04 am
(see U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
By Eric Goldman Jones v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:29 pm
Jack Smith, the federal special counsel in the Trump Jan. 6 case (and Florida stolen classified documents case), has done his best to explain to the American people what kind of criminal occupied the White House from 2017 until early 2021. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 1:53 am
In Bender v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:49 am
Ed. 2d 696 (2013) and Birchfield v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:49 am
Ed. 2d 696 (2013) and Birchfield v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:17 am
In the case of the House of Representatives, in particular, they sought to create a representative form of government “dependent on the people alone,” in the words of James Madison. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:45 pm
To keep up with all the latest in Art Law news, Resnick suggests people go to http://theartlawblog.blogspot.com/. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:57 pm
In Cady v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
Manginelli v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
They employed FUD tactics before (during the district court trial and after Oracle appealed), misleading some people to believe that anyone using an API to write apps for a platform would have to worry, which was never the issue. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:38 am
People v. [read post]
