Search for: "People v. Howes" Results 2441 - 2460 of 31,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
  But he says that the lawsuit has resulted in a "significant benefit" to the public, so he's entitled to fees under Section 1021.5 of the CCP.The trial court and the Court of Appeal disagree, as do I.There's no good proof about how many people (if any) were in the same situation as Villarreal. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:33 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The New York State Assembly has proposed a law that would make sweeping changes to how people communicate on the Internet. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  How people think about their choices in the creative process. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:11 am by Guest Author
Natural Resources Defense Council, I was struck by how different people can see the exact same facts and yet draw such wildly different conclusions from them. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 1:02 pm
He developed a sarcastic and antagonistic persona online, provoking people by comments he made on YouTube videos. . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
How the case developed The 30 complainants complained about two articles in the Times and one in the Sunday Times which purported to describe this meeting which had been organised by a group called the Palestinian Return Centre and chaired by Baroness Tonge. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:42 pm by Joey Fishkin
Valeo in 1976.In Arizona Free Enterprise v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
The federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act basically says that the state can't burden religious practices for people in an "institution" -- e.g., a prison. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 7:00 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 The report documents that in the first year after the Dobbs v. [read post]