Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN" Results 2441 - 2460 of 6,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2010, 1:33 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
That whole process was eliminated by the 1992 law, and from that point forward, any new License Revocation could not be undone except by a License Appeal to the Michigan Secretary of State's DAAD (Driver's Assessment and Appeal Division, which was then known as the DLAD, or Driver's License Appeal Division). [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:41 pm
" He says, "By permitting lay juries to second-guess the FDA's decisions on what options doctors should have available in administering prescription drugs, the Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Michigan Academy of Family Physicians, 476 U.S. 667, 670 (1986), and because, since our precedent in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
 Born in 1922, Wellman taught at the University of Michigan and the University of Georgia. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 13905 (ED MI, Jan. 14, 2016), a Michigan federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's claim that the jail offered no books, services, advice, or counseling for Jewish inmates.In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
City of San Rafael, 395 P.3d 274, 278 (Cal. 2017) (observing that California’sstate constitution has no case or controversy requirement imposing an independent jurisdictional limitation on our standing doctrine”); Tax Found. of Hawai’i v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:22 pm by John D. Graham
That became quite clear last term in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm by WIMS
DVL's complaint asserts claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the New York State common law of indemnification, trespass, and nuisance. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 5:55 am by Howard Friedman
State of Washington, (9th Cir.,, Oct. 15, 2018), the 9th Circuit held that the district court properly dismissed an inmate's 1st Amendment and RLUIPA claims regarding burning of his hair.In Ahdom v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm by Lisa McElroy
The Court also refused to grant an injunction – or order someone to do something – in an original action, the one involving the state of Michigan and its Asian carp problem. [read post]