Search for: "True v. United States" Results 2441 - 2460 of 9,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 5:19 am by Michael O'Hear
The federal sentencing story, like the more general story of mass incarceration in the United States, likely involves a complex interplay of many causal factors. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am by Amy Howe
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
 As the Court noted, “[t]hat may be true – but it [is] true for all agency actions subjected to judicial review. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
’ On April 29, 2008, [Krzewski] inquired on the Union Square Forums whether it was true that an owner of a condominium unit had been injured due to faulty construction. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
The parties to the lawsuit had sold a database, which collected police reports from across the United States, to LexisNexis. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am by Rory Little
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  However much Madison’s Federalist essays advocated the true “original” version of interposition and assumed the efficacy and desirability of state monitoring, Hamilton’s contributions saw interposition as a strictly limited–probably unavoidable--procedure and maintained that the true monitor of federalism was not the state legislatures but the central government and its Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by Orin Kerr
But, unless I got that part right by accident, how an opinion in this case in 1971 from the Supreme Court of the United States might be “Elizabethan” eluded me. [read post]