Search for: "U.S. v. Doe (john)" Results 2441 - 2460 of 6,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Remember that day’s Espinoza v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am by John Buhl
Specifically, this is to prevent “hybrid dividends” that receive a deduction in the foreign country when paid to the U.S. and when received in the United States, resulting in effectively no tax on that flow of income.[8] The participation exemption excludes ordinary foreign profits paid to parent corporations in the form of dividends, but it does not exclude capital gains. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am by Zack Bluestone, Chris Mirasola
The agreement will initially be valid for ten years but does not allow for permanent U.S. bases, as existed before 1991. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
Oregon (U.S. 1973) ("the Due Process Clause... does speak to the balance of forces between the accused and his accuser. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
Sanford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), which Huckabee described as still the “law of the land. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am by admin
This is especially the case in light of the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
U.S. officials stated that “the U.S. does not hold or control any of this money. [read post]