Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
The intervening Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, by Mr Stilitz, supported the position of the council. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Patricia’s daughter continues in her declaration to state what anyone would have to agree is the obvious. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am by Rosalind English
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm by David Cheifetz
The first example offered is the facts of  Cook v Lewis. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
This question arose before the England & Wales High Court in Barthelemy v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There is still a tension between the ruling of the House of Lords (as it then was) in Campbell v MGN and the subsequent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Von Hannover v Germany. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am by Thomas Surmanski
This case is a huge personal win for Joseph Groia, who has been carrying this burden since after R. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:53 am
In particular, Lord Mance and Lord Collins examined the issue of when non-signatories may be treated as parties in great detail. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am by Thomas Surmanski
This case is a huge personal win for Joseph Groia, who has been carrying this burden since after R. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:56 am by Legal Beagle
More on the story HERE & HEREThe full ruling from the Supreme Court : Supreme Court Judgement in AXA General Insurance Limited and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate and others (Respondents) (Scotland) (pdf)The Scottish Government issued the following statement welcoming the Supreme Court’s decision :Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill today welcomed a Supreme Court decision to dismiss a legal challenge to a historic Act of the Scottish Parliament. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill has passed through the House of Commons and will now proceed to the House of Lords for consideration. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by JURIST Staff
Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Tom Bingham, in his book “The Rule of Law”, while explaining the rule of fair trial cited a House of Lords’s case “Regina v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:32 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
” Citing Lord Reid in Burmah Oil Co (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75, the Court determined: “The prerogative is really a relic of a past age, not lost by disuse, but only available for a case not covered by statute. [read post]