Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others – read judgment In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see our contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to be coming up smelling of roses. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
Thomas made a submission to the House of Lords Committee on Communications and Digital’s inquiry into the future of journalism, making his comments about the industry alongside representatives from publishing companies, academics and journalists. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm
Finally on that day a judgment was given in a similar application which had been made to lift an injunction held by Sir Fred Goodwin, Goodwin v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 1309 (QB) following Sir Fred’s naming in the House of Lords by Lord Stoneham. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
“Transaction costs, privacy, and trust: The laudable goals and ultimate failure of notice and choice to respect privacy online”, Kirsten Martin, First Monday, Next week in the courts On 22 and 23 January 2014, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Wilson, Reed, Hughes and Hodge) will hear the case of Secretary of State for Home Department v A. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
The DPDI Bill is currently being debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:30 am
Lord Carey’s PTO reinstated. [read post]
8 May 2011, 10:55 pm
Clarke also told the conference that states must “send the best possible judges to serve on the Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am
KF35 v. 59 Congressional Record 7455 (May 21, 1920) Draft of Hawaiian Homes Commission Act amended by George McClellan, December 1920, William E. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
Zehentner v Austria, a judgment of the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights, demonstrates yet again that the ECHR has a different approach to mandatory rights to possession than the House of Lords has expressed in the trilogy of cases (Buckley, Connors, McCann and Cosic against Qazi, Kay, Doherty). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
BBC and Dominic Casciani v Secretary of State for Justice High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) [2012] EWHC 13 (Admin) January 11, 2012 High Court rules Justice Secretary’s refusal to grant BBC permission to have a face? [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
The Court of Human Rights held that the award of £1.5 million to Lord Aldington in respect of a pamphlet alleging that he was a war criminal was a disproportionate interference with freedom of expression (see Tolstoy v United Kingdom (1995) 20 EHRR 442). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
” The ECtHR in Dudgeon v UK (Application no. 7525/76, Oct. 22, 1981) examined the engagement of Article 8, finding a violation in a Council of Europe member state on the basis of legislation criminalizing sodomy in Northern Ireland. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
This overrides the orthodox position at common law (as re-affirmed by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Michaels [2000] 1 WLR 1004), to the effect that each actionable publication of a defamatory statement constitutes a separate tort which must be considered separately when deciding if the English court has jurisdiction to hear a claim about it. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
