Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 2481 - 2500
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
This Week at the Military Commissions, 12/6 Session: Please Don’t Discuss That Unclassified Document
8 Dec 2016, 12:22 pm
The court jumps right in with a discussion of Chief Prosecutor Brigadier General Mark Martins’s decision to appoint special trial counsel to investigate the defense’s possible mishandling of classified information. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Not just for likely confusion, but also use as a mark. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:01 am
Where you notice a marked, sudden downturn in employee performance, engagement, or output, it can be a sign of quiet quitting. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
Protecting against confusion isn’t disapproval of the content of the mark itself. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:07 pm
Thanks for the shout-out to Lawfare, Mark! [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am
Hmm, don't give up the day job, Mark! [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
" The Board noted that Applicant displays the term in a manner (shown below) that "highlights the combination of two separate and distinct words: 'consumer' and 'affairs.'"In any case, many government agencies use the compounded term "consumeraffairs" as part of their URL path [e.g., www.njconsumeraffairs.com].Finally, the Board found that "[t]he addition of “.com” does not make the entire mark incongruous, nor does it… [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 2:02 am
Then you see behaviors that would mark literal insanity, if they were born from a single mind. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 10:08 am
The answer could hinge on whether either company decides to use the mark to designate itself as the source of certain goods or Spaceman, for that matter. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
Area-man Mark Herrmann didn’t choose to be a hero. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
When he received this information, the Discussion Paper didn't seem to be on the Attorney General Department's website -- but it is now [if you're about to go on holiday, don't! [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Sorry, Mark, it doesn’t work that way. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
Here's a powerful piece of prose from Mark Anderson with the pull-no-punches title of "Amateurism doesn't work for IP", which it doesn't [adds Merpel: even professionalism doesn't always work either ...]. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 pm
Class 46's Fidel Porcuna brings news of a Spanish ruling on likelihood of confusion in a trade mark case where Kelloggs established that the fact that the applicant for a similar mark is a private label business doesn't vitiate the risk that consumers will be confused. [read post]
13 May 2018, 1:41 pm
How can the need to interpret the law (or, for that matter, patent claims) be avoided? [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:29 am
That didn’t happen here. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
Matters of public concern So, how do prohibitions on disclosure of one’s marked ballot fare under this standard? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
Mark Cuban is indeed fighting the good fight in that regard.I just don't understand why Apple takes a position on design patents that pretty much every other company in the industry disagrees with. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:46 am
"Mark Lemley is an attorney for the Yale students. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:38 pm
If so, you’ll remember that case didn’t go well for Firefly Digital as it used the D-word in explaining and describing its claimed GADGET brand. [read post]
