Search for: "State v. Person" Results 2481 - 2500 of 76,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
On November 3, 2011, a United States District Court in Louisiana denied Norddeutsche Seekabelwerke GmbH’s (“NSW”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:26 am by Patricia W. Moore
A recent opinion from the California Court of Appeals perhaps illustrates the extent to which defendants have been emboldened by the United States Supreme Court's decision striking down personal jurisdiction in Daimler AG v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:28 am by Susan Brenner
Codemakes it a crime, essentially, to possess, transfer or use someone else’s personal identifying information under any of various circumstances, one of which is committing or aiding and abetting a federal crime or a felony under state law. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
We at no stage suggest that economic depravity justify moral depravity, but we certainly recognize that in the real world, such factors may lead a person to crime. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:38 am by David Bernstein
  Here’s the beginning: Buchanan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:36 am by John Jascob
The decision, drawing from recent Supreme Court decisions on personal jurisdiction, overturns 28-year old state precedent (Genuine Parts Company v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by The Federalist Society
This case involves the Fair Housing Act, which states that it is illegal to "refuse to sell or rent...or to refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 6:09 am by Jamison Koehler
In addition to contemporaneity and spontaneity, the proponent of a "present sense impression" hearsay exception must prove that the declarant personally perceived the event described. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It is being handed down and should be read with the Court’s judgment in R (on the application A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 37, which sets out the principles governing this area. [read post]