Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 2481 - 2500 of 7,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm by William A. Ruskin
Connecticut the United States Supreme Court may indeed transform the way we produce and obtain energy. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:30 pm by Rumpole
MADISON:Barak Obama, Constitutional Law professor, lawyer, editor of the Harvahard Law Review and President of the United States fired a warning shot over the bow of the Supreme Court earlier this week. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Pranay Vaddi
The last treaty that limits the United States’s and Russia’s nuclear weapons, the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), will expire in February 2021 unless both states agree to its extension. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Civil process may be employed in a common law criminal contempt prosecution, as was the case in United Nurses. [read post]
If pursued, the DOJ’s probe could be the biggest antitrust hit taken by the movie theater industry since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am by Susan Brenner
Furthermore, the intended effects of the conspiracy -- to recover money for Daniels that would be deposited in the United States -- would have impacted the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
A strong protector of speech Kennedy’s most important free speech opinion was Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Jeremy Liles
” Although they conceded that the purchase and sale of the shares took place outside the United States, the plaintiffs alleged that the Exchange Act still reached their claims under two theories: 1) the purchase was “in connection with” trades made in the United States; and 2) the defendants’ investments constituted an “economic reality” of trades made in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Jeremy Liles
” Although they conceded that the purchase and sale of the shares took place outside the United States, the plaintiffs alleged that the Exchange Act still reached their claims under two theories: 1) the purchase was “in connection with” trades made in the United States; and 2) the defendants’ investments constituted an “economic reality” of trades made in the United States. [read post]