Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, sec. 4 of the draft Order says that "It is the policy of the United States that large social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the functional equivalent of a traditional public forum, should not infringe on protected speech. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
On August 23, 1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Lifland, J.) confirmed a Plan of Reorganization ("the Plan") and appointed Bankruptcy Services, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Jackson, in his famous Veto of the bill renewing the charter of the Bank of the United States declared first that “Mere precedent is a dangerous source of authority…. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:31 am by Dennis Crouch
  Ultimately, they see the bill as crucial to maintaining the United States’ “world’s gold-standard patent system” and its position as the “undisputed world leader in innovation. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
In other words, "the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.'" Id. at 627 (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by W. Casey Biggerstaff
For instance, with respect to the $32.2 billion in security assistance the United States has provided Ukraine since February 24, 2022, Hague Convention XIII unequivocally states “the supply, in any manner, directly or indirectly, by a neutral Power to a belligerent Power, of war-ships, ammunition, or war material of any kind whatever, is forbidden” (art. 6). [read post]