Search for: "Bull v. Bull" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am by Eric
Profitable re-uses that consumer may not directly like. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
BULL 8-1-1798 Question:This is the source of all ex post facto cases: The court holding a law is a ex post facto violation if any of the following have occurred:1st. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2019 there will be a hearing in the case of Desporte v Bull. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm by Keith Kanouse
The vast majority of today's franchise agreements (that is, "one-sided, franchisor-oriented") normally contain the following provision as one of the conditions to the franchisor agreeing to renew the franchise agreement at the end of the initial term: The Franchisee will sign the Franchisor's then-current form of Franchise Agreement, which agreement may contain terms materially different than the terms of this Agreement. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:39 am by Amy Howe
The 6-3 ruling in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:41 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Ansari v Amini, heard 10-11 November 2020 (Julian Knowles J) Please let us know if there are other reserved… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
| Another "Glen", another GI violation- Hamburg Court considers "Glen Els" an Evocation of "Scotch Whisky" | Around the IP Blogs | BREAKING: German constitutional court Brexit-delay rumours are "bulls***" in on-going UPC saga | "Many are called but few are chosen": When a claim of bad faith succeeded in a trademark matter in Singapore | [Guest Post] IP Education Series #3 | FRAND: OLG Karlsruhe rules on nature, extent and timing of… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]