Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:55 am
In Coast Plaza Doctors Hosp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 7:23 am
Medtronic relied on Buckman Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:03 am
Search westlaw, state court decisions and state workers compensation decisions for cases in which the expert has testified. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
In Angle v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Intermountain Stroke Center, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
In another we praised the court for being "in sync" with sound preemption principals.The latest opinion, Timberlake v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
” Justice Cavanagh dissented and would grant reconsideration for the reasons stated in his dissent in the original opinion. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:40 pm
Supreme Court released its decision today in Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:49 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
He explained that its availability was damaging to his reputation, particularly in his work as a doctor. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
In Liveringhouse v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:50 pm
STF, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:47 pm
In Dudley v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:15 pm
Plaintiff failed to provide evidence that her impairment substantially limited any major life activity, her sole record of impairment was her doctor’s notes that stated a diagnosis and recommendation for continued sick leave, and her only evidence that she was regarded as impaired was the defendants’ alleged perception that she could not perform her job. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:44 am
Hooks v. [read post]
