Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 2501 - 2520 of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:20 am by Sital Kalantry
  The United States, on the other hand, is correct not tolerate human rights abuses in the United States even if it would be permissible in the home country of the diplomat. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:03 am by Simon Lester
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The loss of the Chinese market for that period caused prices to decrease in the United States, which in turn caused harm to plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am by Laura Jehl and Stephanie Malaska
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am by Sasha Volokh
For instance, a state government can't delegate to a church the power to veto the licensing of a bar—that's the doctrine of Larkin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm by David Oscar Markus
From the government's press release:According to the complaint filed in federal court today, Campagna was a sworn trial juror in the federal criminal case of United States v. [read post]