Search for: "Seals v. Seals" Results 2501 - 2520 of 4,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
It strikes impartially at the perjurer and at the honest man who has omitted a precaution, sealing the lips of both. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:41 am
Not so in Australia, where, as the case below, Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp [2019] FCAFC 115, 5 July 2019, shows, the relevant test is whether an implied license can be successfully asserted by the alleged infringer.It is well known that printer manufacturers employ a range of strategies to thwart their ‘generic’ competition, including resorting to IP. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a)   such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably alternative measures… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
"The company sells its Blue Seal Oysters primarily up and down the West Coast and also online.HPP going mainstream? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The counterfeiting, falsifying or altering of money, whether coin or paper, or of instruments of debt created by national, state, provincial, or municipal governments, or coupons thereof, or of bank-notes, or the utterance or circulation of the same, or the counterfeiting, falsifying or altering of the seals of State. 10. [read post]