Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 20,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
29 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
On June 6th 2006, the Court found in judgment Clement v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:49 pm
While he can couch his prognostications with language like “my relatively uninformed read” (for Stern v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:22 am
On March 22, 2017, the Supreme Court held in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:51 pm
So he brings a lawsuit against the AFTE.And not only loses in the trial court, but gets absolutely slammed by the Court of Appeal.It's bad enough that Justice Sills only deems Dougherty's arguments worthy of response in repeated parentheticals. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 6:37 pm
Exch.)] and Jackson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
She held that this claim could not succeed in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Crookes v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:26 am
Ramirez, about a federal court’s power to collect evidence during habeas corpus petitions, and Wooden v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:59 am
When a factual error upon which the Court had relied in Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas in Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas in Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:03 am
This case is particularly hard to predict because the majority opinion could very well be written by more than one Justice, like in McConnell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
The case does not make new law, relying as it does on the House of Lords' test in Stack v Dowden, yet two judges in the lower courts and one Lord Justice in the Court of Appeal, applying that test, considered that the respondent was entitled to a 90% share in the property. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Assuming that doctrine counts for little—a premise Sandy has already by that point extracted from the reader, at least with respect to some judges or justices, the ones the reader believes were on the wrong side of Bush v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
June 2, 2023) Enigma v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:23 pm
” (From The Associated Press:) Dukes, 61, the lead plaintiff, said after Tuesday's arguments that she still believes the justices will allow the case to proceed to trial. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 2:15 pm
The case is BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF NEW YORK V. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 6:58 am
Nov. 27, 2019), was written by Justice Montgomery-Reeves when she was a Vice Chancellor, but Her Honor wrote this decision on the motion for reargument after she recently became a Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court (but the case is still referenced as a Chancery case). [read post]
