Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 28,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2009, 5:47 am
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), and his representation of the State of Louisiana when it sought rehearing in Kennedy v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:54 am
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:54 pm
The Dallas Court of Appeals recently held that the answer to this question is yes; however, the Court based its decision on the specific facts of the case and not on a bright-line rule. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:13 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:39 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
” In supporting this holding, the Federal Circuit quoted its previous holding in the 2004 case, On-Line Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:50 am
A key issue in the case is this line from Tennessee Electric Power Corp. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 2:48 pm
Williams v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm
Henry the Sixth in infant bands crowned King Whose state so many had the managing That they lost France and made his England bleed. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Facebook opinion (the court praises that dissent as “influential”–though surely not more influential in California state courts than Barrett v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:39 pm
Vanderhaeghe to launch a similar line of products in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
., Inc. v County of Westchester, 2010 NY Slip Op 02572, Decided on March 23, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Westchester County correction officers [COs] sustaining an injury in the line of duty and unable to perform their duties as a result of such an injury are eligible General Municipal Law §207-c benefits.The appointing authority may have a CO receiving §207-c benefits periodically examined to determine whether the CO is able to return to work. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 11:08 am
Case citation: Despot v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 11:11 am
United States (Fee to Trust)Bowman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 7:15 am
United States v Karlin, 852 F2d 968 (CA 7, 1988). [read post]
