Search for: "President v. State" Results 2521 - 2540 of 22,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by INFORRM
The judgments are Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v Haigh [2011] EWHC B16 (Fam) and Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v Watson [2011] EWHC B15 (Fam). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:18 am by Florian Mueller
If anything, there may be a further shift from Dusseldorf, where I've only attended one patent trial so far (Huawei v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston lays out the timeline and procedures by which the challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily barring entry into the United States of foreign nationals from six majority-Muslim countries could make its way before the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
Right-wing defenders of the administration are arguing for sweeping notions of federal power, including by relying on a broad interpretation of Arizona v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:36 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit has ruled that New York City business owners can sue the president under the Emoluments Clause, the constitutional provision that says the president (and other federal office holders) cannot "accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or any foreign state. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
The most telling paragraph in the book is a message from the Secretary of the Treasury to the newly elected President of the 2nd Bank saying that (of course) the president's loyalties were to the shareholders, not the public (or US) in general. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
”  President Bush did not claim that he would use preemption to attain this goal, which might of course be reached through many strategies. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
He's unpopular as a result.Various state actors disagree with the individual's views, and as a result, they remove him as the vice-president of a particular Board. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
So here we are: President Bush and Senate Democrats clashed angrily this afternoon, as the president said he would not allow his key aides to testify under oath about the dismissal of United States attorneys, while the Democrats insisted they would settle for no less. [read post]